optical conductivity

Deals with issues related to computation of optical spectra, in RPA (-o c) or by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation (-o b). Includes local field effects, excitons, etc.

Moderators: Davide Sangalli, andrea marini, Conor Hogan, myrta gruning

optical conductivity

Postby Weiqing Zhou » Sat Mar 09, 2019 10:16 am

Hi all,

I want to whether there is a way to get conductivity /sigma from Yambo directly.
If answer is no, I can finish it by the relation between dielectric function and conductivity. Before that, I must know the unit of dielectric function in o. file. can anyone tell me this ?

Best,
Weiqing
Weiqing Zhou
Phd student
Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430072
Weiqing Zhou
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:57 am
Location: Wuhan University

Re: optical conductivity

Postby Daniele Varsano » Sun Mar 10, 2019 11:54 am

Dear Weiqing,
no, there is not the possibility to have the conductivity as an output.
Note that the dielectric function by its definition is a mere number so it has not unit.
Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
User avatar
Daniele Varsano
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm

Re: optical conductivity

Postby Weiqing Zhou » Mon Apr 01, 2019 9:38 am

Dear Daniele,

that the dielectric function by its definition is a mere number so it has not unit.

Actully, vaccum dielectric function has well-defined unit [(pi*e^2)/2h].
Can I understand in this way? In Yambo, the output of dielectric function is permittivity, the ratio of dielectric function to that of vaccum.

Best,
Weiqing
Weiqing Zhou
Phd student
Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430072
Weiqing Zhou
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:57 am
Location: Wuhan University

Re: optical conductivity

Postby Daniele Varsano » Mon Apr 01, 2019 9:54 am

Dear Weiqing,
Can I understand in this way? In Yambo, the output of dielectric function is permittivity, the ratio of dielectric function to that of vaccum.

yes, it is as you said.

Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
User avatar
Daniele Varsano
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm

Re: optical conductivity

Postby Weiqing Zhou » Thu May 30, 2019 4:48 am

Dear Daniele,

I want to make sure the dielectric function from Yambo is in the unit of vacuum dielectric function $\epsilon_{0}$, which can be rewritten as
$\epsilon_{0}=\frac {e^{2}}{2\alpha h c}$ where $e$ is the elementary charge, $h$ is exact Planck constant, $\alpha$ is the dimensionless fine-structure constant and $c$ is the light velocity. No any prefactor else?

I want to get conductivity, and a well-fined unit is very important. Now the problem I face is the conductivity I convert from Yambo is two orders of magnitude smaller than that of other articles, while other details are all same.

Best,
Weiqing
Weiqing Zhou
Phd student
Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430072
Weiqing Zhou
 
Posts: 48
Joined: Thu Sep 06, 2018 7:57 am
Location: Wuhan University

Re: optical conductivity

Postby Daniele Varsano » Thu May 30, 2019 10:18 am

Dear Weiqing,
yes, the dielectric function is defined as
eps^-1=1+vX
where v is the Coulomb potential and X is the response function. In vacuum it is exactly 1.
If you are dealing with non-3D bulk systems (e.g. 2D systems etc.) issues related to the volume of the supercell arise.

Best,
Daniele
Dr. Daniele Varsano
S3-CNR Institute of Nanoscience and MaX Center, Italy
MaX - Materials design at the Exascale
http://www.nano.cnr.it
http://www.max-centre.eu/
User avatar
Daniele Varsano
 
Posts: 1984
Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 2:23 pm


Return to Linear Response

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

cron