# How to choose the input parameters

In the previous tutorial, you have been guided step-by-step through the calculations of the optical spectrum of bulk h-BN by solving the Bethe-Salpeter equation. The values for the relevant input parameters have then been given to you.

In this tutorial you will learn how to choose these parameters which are related either to the truncation of infinite sums or to the approximations of infinitesimal with small, but finite quantities. A wrong choice of these parameters can lead to inaccurate or even physically wrong results. One needs to run a series of calculations by changing the parameters unitl the results are converged , meaning they are changing by a negligible amount. This is a tedious still essential part of determining the optical properties of a system.

Note that all the operations described below can be automated. A flexible python-based interface to yambo, yambopy, can be used for this purpose. It is worth however to go at least once through the pain of a 'by-hand' convergence study so to better understand the automated process.

## Before starting

You need to

• download the SAVE folders for the BSE convergence (not yet working!). For the CECAM tutorial, do:
$cd YAMBO_TUTORIALS/hBN/YAMBO/BSE_Convergence/  • Have completed (or be familiar with their content of) the following tutorials: ## Background Coming back to the scheme to calculate the macroscopic dielectric matrix within Bethe-Salpeter (BS), the list of the parameters that have to be determined by convergence studies are: This provides as well a scheme for a full convergence study: • first the parameters for the screening have to be determined, • then the parameters for the BS kernel, and • finally the convergence with respect to the choice of the k-mesh needs to performed. ## Convergence of the static screening The parameters that need to be converged can be understood by looking at the equations: where χGG' is given by • NGsBlkXs : The dimension of the microscopic inverse matrix, related to Local fields • BndsRnXs : The sum on bands in the independent particle χ0GG' Furthermore as shown in this tutorial one can reduce the value of • FFTGvecs since generally, fewer G-vectors are needed than what are needed in DFT calculations. This can be critical for large calculations, or for supercells with a lot of vacuum. Remember that the latter parameter appears only when the input is generated specifying the verbosity level -V RL The convergence for the static screening then is similar to the convergence of other response functions and for the plasmon-pole in GW calculations and won't be covered here. Note in fact that you can re-use the database obtained (and converged) from a previous plasmon pole calculation as long as the same k-points are used. ## Convergence of the macroscopic dielectric function In the expression for the macroscopic dielectric function depends on the summation over the pair of quasiparticle states vck. • BSEBands : defines the vc pairs. • the k-point mesh of the DFT calculations defines the k Basically we need a large enough basis of transitions (pair of quasiparticle states) to correctly describe the excitons (in the energy region of interest). Furthermore, in the kernel components the summations over G vectors appear. These corresponds to two parameters: • BSENGblk: defines the screened interaction block size (double sum in W), related to the electron-hole attraction. • BSENGexx: defines the components of Hartree potential (the sum in V), related to local fields. In the following we will see how the spectrum depends on these parameters. ### Prepare the common databases Enter the 6x6x2 directory and run the initialization. For all the calculations in this sessions you can fix the screening parameters, and thus calculate the screening once for all. Following the scheme we learned in previous tutorial: • Create the input for calculating the screening: $ yambo -F 02_screening.in -b

• Modify the input as follows
NGsBlkXs = 4 Ry
%BndsRnXs
1 | 40 |
%
%LongDrXS
1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000|
%

• Run the calculation for the screening
$yambo -F 02_screening.in  As we do not specify a particular prefix, the screening databases ndb.dip_iR_and_P, ndb.em1s are saved in the SAVE folder and visible to all the subsequent jobs you will launch is this directory. ### Convergence with the cut-off for reciprocal lattice vectors sums As next step, create the input for calculating the macroscopic dielectric function: $ yambo -F 03_bse.in -o b -k sex -y d -V qp


Which combines the BS kernel + BS solver (diagonalization) runlevels

• Modify the input as follows
BSENGexx = 30 Ry
BSENGBlk = 4 Ry
% BSEBands
6 | 10 |
%
% BEnRange
2.00000 | 8.00000 | eV
%
BEnSteps= 100
% BDmRange
0.10000 |  0.10000 | eV
%
% BLongDir
1.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 |
%
% KfnQP_E
1.440000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 |
%

• Launch the calculation:
$yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_4Ry_GBlk  This produces the file with the optical spectrum o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse. • Open the 03_bse.in in an editor and changes: BSENGBlk = 3 Ry  while leaving the rest untouched. • Launch the calculation: $ yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_3Ry_GBlk


This produces the file with the optical spectrum o-3D_3Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse.

• Repeat this operation for BSENGBlk= 2 Ry and BSENGBlk= 1 Ry. Remember to change the prefix correspondingly so that you can later on identify the job, e.g. -J
 

3D_2Ry_GBlk for BSENGBlk= 2 Ry. etc.

• Finally plot the obtained optical spectra:
$gnuplot plot 'o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '4 Ry','o-3D_3Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '3 Ry', 'o-3D_2Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '2 Ry', 'o-3D_1Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '1 Ry'  This shows that BSENGBlk= 2 Ry gives already a results close to convergence and we can confidently lower BSENGBlk to 2 or 3 Ry. • Repeat now the same procedure with BSENGexx. Change the value to 10 Ry and 20 Ry. Remember to change the prefix correspondingly so that you can later on identify the job, e.g. -J    3D_10Ry_Gexx for BSENGexx= 10 Ry. etc. • Finally plot the obtained optical spectra: $ gnuplot
plot  'o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '30 Ry' ls 1,'o-3D_20Ry_Gexx.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '20 Ry',  'o-3D_10Ry_Gexx.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '10 Ry'


The plot shows that already with BSENGexx= 10 Ry the spectrum is converged and the cut-off can be lowered to this value.

### Convergence with the BS bands

You can now repeat the procedure above keeping fixed all parameters to their original values except for

% BSEBands
6 | 10 |
%


Typically only the bands which are close to the Fermi energies contributes to the spectrum. If the energy separation between two bands is much larger than the spectral energy range, you can assume the corresponding transitions are not contributing to the spectra.

• Repeat then the calculation for the optical spectrum using the following band ranges:
7-10, 8-10, 6-9, 7-9 and 8-9.


When launching the job remember to identify your job with a recognizable name, e.g. -J 3D_7-9_BND for the 7-9 range.

• Plot the optical spectra obtained from the different runs:
$gnuplot plot 'o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '6-10 Bands','o-3D_7-10_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '7-10 Bands', 'o-3D_8-10_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '8-10 Bands' plot 'o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '6-10 Bands','o-3D_6-9_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '6-9 Bands', 'o-3D_7-9_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '7-9 Bands', 'o-3D_8-9_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '8-9 Bands'  The plots show that we need to include valence bands from at least 6-7 (those bands are degenerate at several high symmetry points of the Brillouin zone) and conduction at least up to band 10. To see if this is sufficient you can try to include more bands. For example you can prepare and run calculations with the following bands ranges: 1-12, 4-12, 4-14 and plot the results: $ gnuplot
plot  'o-3D_4Ry_GBlk.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '6-10 Bands','o-3D_4-12_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '4-12 Bands', 'o-3D_4-14_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '4-14 Bands', 'o-3D_1-12_BND.eps_q1_diago_bse' w l t '1-12 Bands' ls 4


The plot is showing that the spectrum changes only marginally when adding those bands.

## Convergence with the k-point mesh

As final step you need to study the dependence on the k mesh. This parameter cannot be changed in yambo. For each k mesh you need to run a separate non-self consistent DFT calculation (on top of a converged self-consistent one) and generate the corresponding SAVE folders. Be careful to change only the k mesh.

For this exercise the SAVE databases for different meshes were generated beforehand and are contained in the corresponding folders:

9x9x3 12x12x4 15x15x5 18x18x6


By now you should be familiar with the process:

• Enter the 9x9x3 directory
• Run the initialization
• Create the input for calculating the screening:
 $yambo -F 02_screening.in -J 3D_993 -b  • Modify the input as follows NGsBlkXs = 4 Ry %BndsRnXs 1 | 40 | % %LongDrXS 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000| %  • Run the calculation for the screening $ yambo -F 02_screening.in -J 3D_993

• Create the input for calculating the macroscopic dielectric function:
$yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_993 -o b -k sex -y h -V qp  Which combines the BS kernel + BS solver (Lanczos-Haydock) runlevels • Modify the input as follows BSENGexx = 30 Ry BSENGBlk = 4 Ry % BSEBands 6 | 10 | % % BEnRange 2.00000 | 8.00000 | eV % BEnSteps= 200 % BDmRange 0.10000 | 0.10000 | eV % % BLongDir 1.000000 | 1.000000 | 0.000000 | % % KfnQP_E 1.440000 | 1.000000 | 1.000000 | % BSHayTrs= 0.02000  • Launch the calculation: $ yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_993

• Repeat the procedure for the 12x12x4 (it will take few minutes) with the difference you will use a different prefix: -J 3D_12124.

The convergence on the k-point is certainly the most tedious and expensive part. Note that for the two larger meshes the calculations of both the screening and kernel take about 10 to 30 minutes each. If short of time/resources postpone these calculations. If you have the time and computational resources repeat the above procedure for 15x15x5 and 18x18x6.

Note that for those meshes the BS kernel database is becoming very/too large and you need to fragment it. To do that after you generated and modified the input invoke yambo again as:

$yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_15155 -o b -k sex -y h -V io  and modify the variable  DBsFRAGpm= "+BS"  Then launch the calculation $ yambo -F 03_bse.in -J 3D_15155


If you correctly followed the above procedure you should have a file with the optical absorption spectrum for each mesh, e.g. o-3D_993.eps_q1_haydock_bse. To see the effect of k-points plot those files with gnuplot:

\$ gnuplot
plot '18x18x6/o-3D_18186.eps_q1_haydock_bse' w l t '18x18x6, '15x15x5/o-3D_15155.eps_q1_haydock_bse' w l t '15x15x5','12x12x4/o-3D_12124.eps_q1_haydock_bse' w l t '12x12x4,
'9x9x3/o-3D_993.eps_q1_haydock_bse' w l t '9x9x3', '6x6x2/o-3D_662.eps_q1_haydock_bse' w l t '6x6x2'


From this plot you can notice that:

• results with the 6x6x2 mesh are clearly not converged: the first peak is too red shifted, the peak at 6 eV too sharp and intense and there is an 'extra' peak at 7 eV.
• both the position and shape of the first peak are practically converged with the 9x9x3 mesh.
• conversely the second peak is still not fully converged with the 18x18x6.

The different behavior in the convergence of the two features depends on the localization of the exciton. The sharp first peak suggests a localized exciton. The shape of the second peak a much more delocalized exciton. A finer k mesh, corresponds in direct space, to considering a larger amount of unit cells. Then when the excitation is delocalized over a large number of unit cells a very fine k mesh is needed. Typically a too coarse k mesh induces an artificial localization of the excitons which then correspond to artefacts in the spectrum (similar to what is observed for the 6x6x9). A nice, instructive discussion on wrong deductions from unconverged k mesh calculations can be found in the Appendix of Molina-Sanchez et al. (2013).[1]

## Summary

To sum-up the results from this tutorial you have found that for the system under study:

• BSENGBlk= 3 Ry
• BSENGexx= 10 Ry
• BSEBands from 6 to 10
• To converge the position and shape of the first exciton peak a 12x12x4 mesh is sufficient. For the second exciton peak a mesh larger than 18x18x6 would be needed (indeed Wirtz and co-workers found a k-mesh 24x24x10 was needed.[2])

## References

1. Alejandro Molina-Sánchez, Davide Sangalli, Kerstin Hummer, Andrea Marini, and Ludger Wirtz Phys. Rev. B 88, 045412 (2013)
2. Ludger Wirtz, Andrea Marini, Myrta Gruning, Angel Rubio in arXiv:cond-mat/0508421 [cond-mat.mtrl-sci]